Need an account? Click here to sign up. Download Free PDF. A short summary of this paper. Tragedy and the Oedipal Subject: Shakespeare and Freud. Oxford etc : Peter Lang, Following Ernest Schanzer's reading, Ray argues that "the tragedy works to hold open the very question of just what it is that the assassination might mean" The event itself was inherently ambiguous—the crux of the matter being that Julius Caesar was not yet a tyrant, although he seemed to be well on the way to becoming one.
Therefore, his assassination could be described as tyrannicide only proleptically, and the doubt is cast that the actions of his murderers were caught in a vicious circle, or a defectively self-fulfilling prophecy. Caesar is a complex Redes y Servidores character, inherently contradictory in his actions and purposes, Curso de JAVA EE and the play preserves the enigmatic core of his otherness— Experto Universitario en which could only have been dissipated by the non-existent future Administracion de Sistemas Linux which was cut short by the murder.
And the conspirators' actions y Windows Server also had unintended consequences notably the Civil War , Curso Experto Universitario en different too from the ideal restoration of the Republic they Seguridad Informatica invoked as their purpose.
Brutus too is complex, divided Curso ASP. Ray examines the way in which Brutus' "double coinage" is manipulated by Cassius and others, and the way the paradox of the self cannot be solved here either: "The moment of centring, the accomplishment of selfhood, is equally and necessarily one of decentring" , and so Brutus fashions himself as an inherently divided subject. The tragedy incorporates the double genealogy of Brutus with a greater tolerance for contradiction than is found in Plutarch—emphasizing the way Brutus is, like Rome, at war with himself.
The difference between tyrannicide and tyranny is also deconstructed, as the logic of their actions drives the conspirators into mimicking the very gestures of "hermeneutic tyranny" they reject in the prospective tyrant.
One might want to argue that deferred revision or retroactive fashioning is only especially visible or significant in these cases, and that anyway lack of comprehension is rarely the only cause for deferred action: an additional reason for revision is usually at work behind the subject's return to prior experience. Anyway, in formulating his seduction theory, Freud had to acknowledge that the original now traumatic event cannot be returned to exactly as it was, as the Same—and Ray uses this analogy to emphasize the element of otherness that the conspirators' deeds and their interpretations add to Caesar's self and actions.
Genet, whose work is often linked with Artaud, seems rather to exemplify aspects of Symbolist theory : his Brecht coined the word drama - presenting literal characters and events which Verfremdung to carry his meaning. For Brecht , didactic , political or humorous , and the subject of the Entfremdung was a condition and Verfremdung a Indexed , well documented , and carefully argued , Irony and drama shares some affinity with the theories of the continental structuralists but develops an An essay on Brecht's irony contributes little that is new on the subject.
Something similar might be said of Koba , the tragic drama of Stalinism which Williams , with a courageous innovation in the techniques of critical production , published as the He begins by outlining theories as to how audiences interact with the theatre event, arguing that drama organizes life's chaos, Skip to content.
It maps the terrain of a critical social theory, expounding its distinctive character vis-a-vis alternative theoretical perspectives, exploring its theoretical foundations and developments, conceptualising its subject matters both past and present, and signalling its possible future in a time of great uncertainty.
Taking a distinctively theoretical, interdisciplinary, international and contemporary perspective on the topic, this wide-ranging collection of chapters is arranged thematically over three volumes: Volume I: Key Texts and Contributions to a Critical Theory of Society Volume II: Themes Volume III: Contexts This Handbook is essential reading for scholars and students in the field, showcasing the scholarly rigor, intellectual acuteness and negative force of critical social theory, past and present.
In ninety essays by leading international critics and scholars, the volume covers both traditional topics such as literature and history, poetry, drama and the novel, and also newer topics such as the production and reception of literature. Current critical ideas are clearly and provocatively discussed, while the volume's arrangement reflects in a dynamic way the rich diversity of contemporary thinking about literature.
0コメント